DOES THE “PUBLIC PURPOSE DEFENCE” TO EXPROPRIATION IS CONSONANT WITH THE “SOLE EFFECT DOCTRINE”, AND WHETHER CAN THEY BE RECONCILED?

Authors

  • Mokhinur Rakhmatullaeva Senior student at Westminster International University in Tashkent

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HGPNJ

Keywords:

international standard, regulation, private property.

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of the international standard of legal expropriation and its refraction in the norms of national legislations of states. The author's special attention is focused on the content of the concept of expropriation within the framework of national legal systems. The author reveals the legal content of the concept of expropriation, as well as reveals the patterns and features of the legal regulation of expropriation as an independent legal form of compulsory seizure of private property.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

Mokhinur Rakhmatullaeva. (2022). DOES THE “PUBLIC PURPOSE DEFENCE” TO EXPROPRIATION IS CONSONANT WITH THE “SOLE EFFECT DOCTRINE”, AND WHETHER CAN THEY BE RECONCILED?. Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 3(10), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HGPNJ

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 10 (2022): ejedl.academiascience

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.